|
TakeAction!

View,
print and distribute our flyer!
Other Iowa Web Sites:
http://www.iowavoters.org
http://www.voterownediowa.org
http://www.blogforiowa.com
National Web Sites:
http://votetrustusa.org
http://blackboxvoting.org
www.verifiedvoting.org
www.votersunite.org
http://accurate-voting.org
http://coalition4visibleballots.
homestead.com
|
Use
of DREs in Iowa’s 2006 Primary Election
Prepared
by Carole Simmons, Ph.D.
Print
Version (Word file)
Background:
Our main objective in doing this survey was
to determine what percentage of Iowa voters used a
Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) touchscreen in
the June 2006 primary.
Each county in Iowa uses one of the
following three types of voting systems at its
polling places:
-
DREs
only (other than absentee ballots).
-
A
blend of paper ballots and DREs. Voters may
opt to use either type of system.
-
Paper
ballots only. Ballots are counted by Precinct
Count Optical Scan (PCOS), and Ballot Marking
Devices (BMDs) are used for accessibility.
Methods
and Results:
Three types of survey questions and
responses were used, to match the voting system of
each county in question.
The survey was conducted by email, with the
exception of a small number of counties contacted
by telephone.
For
the 19 counties using only DREs, we asked
-
How
many voters took part in the primary in your
county?
-
How
many absentee ballots were cast?
-
Were
the absentee ballots counted by a scanner, by
DRE, or by hand?
We
had responses from ten of these counties.
In Clayton County, absentee ballots were
counted on DREs; we considered these to be votes
on a DRE. All
other nine counties used a scanner to count their
absentee ballots.
Averaging across the ten counties, the DRE
usage rate was 90 percent.
(The nine counties missing are Appanoose,
Clay, Fayette, Jackson, Keokuk, Lucas, Plymouth,
Warren, and Wayne.)
|
DRE/DRE
Cos.
|
#Absentee
|
#DRE
|
Total
|
%DRE
|
notes
|
|
Poweshiek
|
310
|
1342
|
1652
|
81%
|
|
|
Union
|
205
|
983
|
1188
|
83%
|
|
|
Monroe
|
118
|
568
|
686
|
83%
|
|
|
Ringgold
|
95
|
716
|
811
|
88%
|
|
|
Mahaska
|
143
|
1123
|
1266
|
89%
|
|
|
Mitchell
|
71
|
691
|
762
|
91%
|
|
|
Marion
|
113
|
1484
|
1597
|
93%
|
|
|
Winnebago
|
39
|
732
|
771
|
95%
|
|
|
Worth
|
18
|
517
|
535
|
97%
|
|
|
Clayton
|
(225)
|
1775
|
1775
|
100%
|
225
absentee ballots counted on DRE
|
|
|
|
9931
|
11043
|
90%
|
|
Table
1. Data
for DRE-only Counties
In
the 59 Blended counties using Optical Scan and
DREs, we asked for the total numbers who voted
using 1) paper ballots, and 2) DRE touchscreen
machines. We
had responses from 43 of these counties. Table 2
presents data for these counties, arranged in
order of DRE usage rate.
As can be seen, this rate varied widely
from county to county, from a low of 1.7 percent
to a high of 74.9 percent.
|
County
|
No.
Paper
|
No.
DRE
|
Total
|
%DRE
|
|
Scott
|
13928
|
236
|
14164
|
1.7%
|
|
Audubon
|
604
|
19
|
623
|
3.0%
|
|
Decatur
|
773
|
40
|
813
|
4.9%
|
|
Dickinson
|
1195
|
68
|
1263
|
5.4%
|
|
Mills
|
1147
|
80
|
1227
|
6.5%
|
|
Lee
|
2766
|
250
|
3016
|
8.3%
|
|
Winneshiek
|
2554
|
274
|
2828
|
9.7%
|
|
Ida
|
692
|
75
|
767
|
9.8%
|
|
Des
Moines
|
3299
|
432
|
3731
|
11.6%
|
|
Jefferson
|
961
|
135
|
1096
|
12.3%
|
|
Linn
|
10533
|
1627
|
12160
|
13.4%
|
|
Johnson
|
9564
|
2342
|
11906
|
19.7%
|
|
Cherokee
|
736
|
189
|
925
|
20.4%
|
|
Black
Hawk
|
8204
|
2330
|
10534
|
22.1%
|
|
Clarke
|
411
|
197
|
608
|
32.4%
|
|
Clinton
|
1925
|
996
|
2921
|
34.1%
|
|
Madison
|
1167
|
634
|
1801
|
35.2%
|
|
Davis
|
635
|
376
|
1011
|
37.2%
|
|
Page
|
429
|
388
|
817
|
47.5%
|
|
Sioux
|
2364
|
2146
|
4510
|
47.6%
|
|
Howard
|
349
|
317
|
666
|
47.6%
|
|
Shelby
|
| |